Australia’s First Environment Party

12/11/2007

darrenwaw.jpgBring Back Balance

Australian Democrats

Media Release 11 November 2007

Australia’s First Environment Party

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, Darren Churchill, used today’s Walk Against Warming rally in Civic to remind voters of the Democrats role as Australia’s first environment party.

Mr Churchill was handed a microphone as he joined protestors in leaving Ainslie Avenue, along London Circuit.

“The Australian Democrats were Australia’s first environment party. For thirty years, we’ve been speaking up on environmental issues and introducing environmentally supportive legislation!” stated an emphatic Mr Churchill. “The only way to ensure that continues is to vote 1 Churchill for Fraser, and for Norvan Vogt and Anthony David in the Senate.”

Significant environment victories for the Democrats have included the World Heritage Properties Protection Bill 1982, protection for Australia’s rainforests and the Great Barrier Reef, removing tax deductions for destroying native trees, protection of environment and heritage sites, excise cuts for clean fuels, greenhouse abatement and vehicle conversion packages for alternative fuels. There have been many others.

A vegetarian, Mr Churchill today gave support to the Vegetarian Society’s call for “Diet Change for Climate Change.” “It’s important to think about how the way we live impacts on Global Warming. Looking at all aspects of our lifestyle, including diet, are part of that.” Mr Churchill said after the rally.

Immediately following the Walk against Warming, Mr Churchill made himself available at the Australian Democrats stall to meet voters and discuss the Democrats environment policies.

“The Democrats have always regarded environmental protection and sustainability as being an extremely important economic, moral and social issue. It’s all about getting the balance right between the environment, the economy and social justice”, declared Mr Churchill.

Darren Churchill

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser

Darren.Churchill@act.democrats.org.au

0412 196 473

Pictures of me at our stall at the Walk Against Warming, Civic, ACT, November 11, 2007

11/11/2007

darrenwaw.jpgdarrenwaw2.jpg

09/11/2007

MTC – Darren Churchill – Australian Democrats

My speech to The Justice Project – Human Rights Forum, Dickson College, 08/11/2007

08/11/2007

(Thanks Kurt. I thank Matilda for her welcome and I acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which we meet).

Anti-terror laws are supposedly about risk mitigation, protecting us from a present risk of terrorism. What is the “present” risk of terrorism? The government is using the perceived risk of terrorism. to frighten us. The government thrives on creating a climate of fear. It used to be “reds under the beds” in the old days of the Cold War. Now it’s “terrorists behind the lampposts” or some other such phrase, for fostering fear, and making us suspicious of anyone who is visibly different from “us” (whatever “us” may be taken to mean). The perceived risk of terrorism is high. But the actual risk of terrorism is minimal by comparison.

Accountability is all about contestable decisions being heard by a court. The right to trial, the principle of habeas corpus, is a protection of liberty and enables people to challenge unlawful custody. There is a right to be heard: for decision makers to be unbiased, the right to know the evidence used against you and the right to know the case against you. This is referred to as “natural justice” (also known as “procedural fairness”). It prevents inaccurate results and means that you are able to defend yourself in court, where only relevant information is taken into account and irrelevant information is put aside (this is why the Haneef case was such a travesty) The courts have a role to act as a balance to the decisions of the executive. They can also act as a protection of peoples’ rights against overenthusiastic law enforcement agencies. (Especially when the government and opposition collude to increase the powers of those agencies, as happened recently).

A government has a duty and a fundamental responsibility to protect it’s citizens but this must be done in accordance with upholding the freedoms it is setting out to protect.

Even in the case of a “national emergency” such as war (or terrorism), basic human rights principles, our civil rights and freedoms (whether under statute or common law) as well as International Humanitarian Laws and the Geneva Conventions must be upheld.

There can still be a presumption against bail in dangerous and drugs cases. And if necessary an arrest order or warrant can still be issued in a very short period of time (about half an hour). But that doesn’t take away the right to have a person’s status determined by a court.

Politicians have an agenda. Courts, rely on evidence and development of the law. Keeping information “protected” from the court, or the defence, and closing courts from public view (except in cases justified to the court for the protection of one of the parties involved, eg. children, (or) domestic violence) (protected Information) involves a lack of scrutiny that risks poor decisions being made.

Our worst comes out when we justify poor decisions in the name of fighting threats of terror or war. When our rights and freedoms are eroded by government actions in the name of fighting some perceived threat to our freedoms, there is also an erosion of our morality. It occurs by undermining all we have worked towards in the evolution and historical development of our justice system. We throw it all out the window in a few short years when we fail to uphold the basic principles of justice on which our civilised society is built.

There is something morally wrong with imposing gaol sentences on journalists for reporting accountability issues. It is not about protecting people from terrorists. It is playing politics. Again, we have a situation of creating a climate of fear. No one is able to say anything, journalists become frightened to report anything for fear of imprisonment. This denies freedom of expression and a free press. It places our law enforcement agencies above the law, above scrutiny. It punishes freedom of information and takes away the publics’ right to be informed by a free and independent press

We need a balance, protecting us from excessive concentration of power by government . The separation of powers and the idea of responsible government as defined in the Australian Constitution is what is meant to give us the checks and balances between the branches of government without fear or interference. However, concentration of the government in the executive has increased with recent decisions by Ministers (such as the Attorney-General or Immigration Minister) to take powers away from the courts (as referred to above). We need to address constitutional reform to give greater clarification and definition to the relationship between the Executive, the Parliament and the Judiciary.

The Australian Democrats have long been the balance between the excessive power of Liberal (and) Labor governments. We will continue to fight for balance, for human rights and protection of privacy, freedom and accountability.

(Thank you).

(Speech given by me at the above meeting at approximately 6.45pm on 08/11/2007 addressing:

Does the “present risk of terrorism” justify:

– The new control orders. Which allow a person considered a threat to be restricted to their home where the person concerned has not been found guilty of an offence by a court?

– ASIO’s new power to detain a person suspected of being a terrorist but against whom there is not enough evidence to bring charges?

– laws that impose a 5 year gaol term on a journalist who reports the fact of a person held in detention under the powers referred to in the previous question?

- the new power of the Attorney-General to close courts to public view?

– the new power of the Attorney-General to prevent a litigant from seeing the evidence used against him or her?)

(Italicised parts of the main text are additional or “ad libs” to the original speech)

The Candidates of Fraser – Stateline (ACT Edition) 02/11/2007

08/11/2007

PHILIP WILLIAMS: First the Federal election. Shortly Michael Brissenden with day 19 of the campaign and the action is hotting up. But we begin with our local coverage, and this week we profile the Fraser electorate and meet the candidates. The commentator is Crispin Hull.

CRISPIN HULL: Since the ACT lost its third seat, the seat of Fraser has been the seat with the most voters of any seat or electorate in the Australia.

At the moment it’s held by Bob McMullan on a very safe margin of 13.3 per cent. The Liberal Party is standing Troy Williams.

Now Troy Williams is probably seen as the poster boy of the Liberal Party because his posters are all over town. But fact is people do not vote on the basis of posters.

The other candidates – the Democrats are standing, now the Democrat vote collapsed in 2004 so you wouldn’t expect the Democrats to get much more than 1 or 2 per cent.

The Citizens’ Electoral Council is again standing here as it’s standing in quite a number of seats around the place. Again, this is a shrapnel sort of party with a grab bag of far left and far right policies and you wouldn’t expect it to get many votes.

Now, the Greens are standing Meredith Hunter. She is the director of the ACTU’s coalition. She’s done quite a lot of work with young people, drug rehabilitation and so on and you’d expect her to do reasonably well. The Greens got around 12 per cent last election and you’d expect them maybe to improve a bit on that.

MEREDITH HUNTER, THE GREENS: Canberra should be a place where every child has access to a quality education, where we have a well resourced health system, where we support investment into renewable energy sources, where we encourage industrial democracy back into our workplaces, and where we ensure that the one in 10 people in our community who are doing it tough, including Commonwealth and Defence Force superannuants, get a fairer go. These are some of the issues that are important to me as a social justice advocate and that’s why I’m standing.

JIM ARNOLD, CITIZENS ELECTORAL COUNCIL: If you categorise the CEC as being in a nutshell old Labor, concern for the common man, support for a development bank that will sponsor major development projects such as water harvesting and high speed rail. Also, of course, we would remedy the crisis in health and education. It’s a crime that we poach much needed skills from third world countries. If you need more you can Google us.

DARREN CHURCHILL, AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRATS: We need balance: the environment, the economy and social justice. Instead of so many tax cuts, I’ll fight for increased funding for hospitals, paid maternity leave, affordable housing, the environment and all levels of education. I’ll fight for human rights and privacy legislation that protects all regardless of race, gender, religion or place of Origin. Choose commonsense by voting one Australian Democrats in both houses, for honesty, tolerance and compassion. Let’s bring back balance.

BOB MCMULLAN, AUSTRALIAN LANOR PARTY: The big issues here in Fraser are the national issues like WorkChoices and Kevin Rudd’s national water plan which has got the potential to help us solve the water crisis here in the ACT. But there’s very big local issues, like getting public service employments into the town centres, Gangland and like solving the traffic congestion around the airport. Those are the big issues I’ll be concentrating on in the next three years if I’m re-elected.

TROY WILLIAMS, LIBERAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA: This election’s important. It’s one where we have the opportunity to re-elect a coalition government which has a demonstrated record of keeping unemployment low and increasing real wages. But it’s a local level where a lot of people make a choice. And my commitment will be to reinvest Commonwealth funds in our Territory schools and to reinvest money back into our hospital systems. My goal will be to put our community back in touch with its electorate, to be an effective local representative for the people of Fraser.

CRISPIN HULL: In all, the seat of Fraser is a very safe Labor seat and, in fact, to be honest the Labor Party could probably stand a white rabbit in the seat of Fraser and it would be elected.

PHILIP WILLIAMS: A white rabbit in the Parliament, that’s an image to conjure. And as we’ve done each week, the order in which the candidates appeared was randomly selected. Crispin Hull was a deliberate choice and we’ll be back next week to look at Eden Monaro. We had to travel further afield to catch up with those candidates, including our 6 hour round trip to a shearing shed in Adelong.

(Transcript from “The Candidates of Fraser” – Broadcast 02/11/2007 on Stateline (ACT Edition) ABC TV

Media Release – 6 November 2007- Return Senate preferences to the voters

08/11/2007
preference_deals.pngMedia Release 6 November 2007

Return Senate preferences to the voters

“Senate preference deals have taken the election of the Senate away from the people and given it to political parties!” claims Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, Darren Churchill.

Much attention has been focused in the last week on who has done deals with whom in preference tickets lodged with the Australian Electoral Commission for “Above-the-Line” Senate voting.

“Above-the-Line voting commits voters to their preferences going the way the party whose box they number directs them. It takes the power of preference allocation away from the voter,” said Mr Churchill

“Only Below-the-Line voting allows voters to allocate preferences to the parties/candidates of their own choice. It is far more democratic and makes it harder for party organisers to predict the outcomes. This gives more power to the voter. It should rightly be the only option for Senate voting.”

“The Senate is meant to be elected by proportional representation. As such it is meant to be the most democratic form of election. What actually happens is it ends up being predominantly elected along party lines at the dictate of party preference deals. These undemocratic preference swaps have led to a reduction of democracy in Senate elections.”

“When the people control where their preferences go, it reflects their will. When the political parties control the preferences, the process becomes bastardised. It’s time to return to electoral honesty,” Mr Churchill said.

Darren Churchill

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser

Darren.Churchill@act.democrats.org.au

0412 196 473

Former Goulburn boy runs for Democrats

02/11/2007
picture-006.jpgFormer Goulburn boy runs for Democrats

FORMER Goulburn man Darren Churchill has been endorsed as the 
Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, ACT. 

The electorate neighbours Goulburn's electorate of Hume to the south.

Originally from Goulburn, Mr Churchill, 43, now lives in Kaleen where he 
works part time as a Boxfit instructor.

As an Anglican, in the liberal-catholic tradition, Mr Churchill has strong 
views on human rights, equality, social justice and inclusiveness.  
Mr Churchill is a vegetarian and is greatly concerned about animal welfare 
and labelling of food.

Mr Churchill is a strong opponent of an ID Card and is concerned about 
the erosion of our freedoms in recent times.

He said he was standing because "a strong voice of the progressive centre 
is needed in Australian politics".

"Someone who will fight for what is right and provide a balanced approach 
in the parliament," 
Mr Churchill said.

"The Australian Democrats are a party that does offer balance and  
sensible approach, and isn't answerable to the interest groups of big 
business, big unions or other powerful lobbyists with a particular agenda. 

"The evenhanded, fair approach of the Democrats is a great attraction 
to me.

"Our poor country is hurting from the divisive politics of exclusion and fear."

Mr Churchill is a vegetarian and is greatly concerned about animal welfare 
and labelling of food.

He was active as a volunteer in the campaign to reinstate South Sydney 
Rabbitohs to the NRL, 
and was active in the Canberra Cosmos and Belconnen Blue Devils Supporters Groups.  

He is also a strong opponent of an ID Card and is concerned about the erosion 
of our freedoms.
(This is a copy of an article that was published about me in The Goulburn Post 
on 24-10-07)

2018 World Cup plans highlight need for junior player development pathways

01/11/2007
ACT Democrats
Media Release 30 October 2007

2018 World Cup plans highlight need for junior player development pathways

“Canberra should have a top grade football (soccer) team in both men’s and women’s competitions”, says Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, Darren Churchill.

Local ABC TV tonight announced Australia is likely to bid to host the 2018 FIFA World Cup.

The ACT has more junior footballers than anywhere else in Australia. In football, as in other sports, we have to give our young players something to aspire to.

Democrat policy aims to promote junior sport and participation in sport at all ages. Canberra football is a prime example of the need for government support for player development pathways.

“We have a stadium that has hosted Olympic football, and World Cup Rugby, but we haven’t had a team in the national football competition since the Cosmos was axed from the old NSL competition in 2001.

Last week former Canberra Cosmos coach (current Matilda’s coach), Tom Sermanni was nominated as a likely Asia Coach of the Year, after the Matilda’s strong performance in the Women’s World Cup.

It was great when we had the Cosmos and the Eclipse (women’s team) in the national competitions. The Belconnen Blue Devils made the NSW Premier League finals almost every year they played in that competition. Canberra Deakin (now Canberra FC) won their final year in the National Youth League. We have lots of talent, but need a pathway to keep young football talent in Canberra and to give us representation in the national football competitions.

A start would be to be to get a team back in the NSW Premier League. Playing out of the McKellar Soccer Centre, and also get a Canberra team in a new national women’s competition, with a view to eventually putting in a successful A-League bid.

“Federal backing and funding to develop a pathway for top grade football participation would help get World Cup football in Canberra and assist young Canberrans to achieve excellence in the sport” Mr Churchill said.

Darren Churchill

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser

Darren.Churchill@act.democrats.org.au

0412 196 473

Democrats candidate wants Bill of Rights: 25-10-07

31/10/2007

Bring Back Balance

ACT Democrats Media Release 25 October 2007

Democrats candidate wants Bill of Rights

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, Darren Churchill said today,”It’s time for action on National Human Rights legislation (a Bill of Rights).

This afternoon, Kurt Esser from The Justice Project was interviewed on ABC Local Radio urging local politicians to act on Human Rights.

The Justice Project is a national project that includes noted human rights advocates Julian Burnside QC and former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser (who today also again advocated a Bill of Rights).

“Both the ACT and Victoria have Human Rights legislation. But we really need national legislation on this issue,” Mr Churchill said.

The Democrats have long campaigned for an Australian Bill of Rights and will introduce new legislation to that effect after the election.

“Australia’s law enforcement agencies have had their powers increased in the name of protecting our freedoms from terrorists. But these increased powers have no accountability to the courts. Nor do they guarantee protection from torture or privacy violations for Australians at home or abroad.

Introducing a Human Rights Act would be the first step towards setting down clear guidelines for the treatment of our citizens and residents and it will be my first act if elected. Ultimately, the idea would be to have the legislation enshrined in the Constitution.” said Mr Churchill

Darren Churchill
Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser

Darren.Churchill@act.democrats.org.au
0412 196 473

Democrats urge caution on GMOs: 24-10-07

31/10/2007
            Bring Back Balance

ACT Democrats Media Release 24 October 2007

Democrats urge caution on GMOs

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser, Darren Churchill, said today,

“When it comes to GMOs, choice and labelling are critical issues”.

In Western Australia today (Wednesday 24 Oct), a delegation from the

Consumers Union of Japan presented the state Agriculture Minister with a

petition urging the WA Government to continue its moratorium on GM crops.

Moratoriums on commercial GM food crops in New South Wales, Victoria and

South Australia are due to expire next year and are currently being

reviewed.

Last year, ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope said at the Biotechnology in

Canberra & Region Summit, “We have to take care that we do not deal

ourselves out of contention when it comes to such areas as stem-cell

research and GMOs”.

Investment in any technology that has benefits for society and promotes

consumer choice should be encouraged, but we must be cautious in relation to

impacts on human health and environmental biodiversity.

“Whilst plant breeding has given us crops that are stronger and resistant to

some type of diseases (eg. wheat that is resistant to drought and rust), we

need to look at long term health and environmental effects of Genetic

Modification before committing to it on a commercial scale”, Mr. Churchill

said.

People have a right to choose GMO foods, or not, if they so wish, but there

are different levels of Genetic Modification, and that makes product

labelling an extremely important issue. Putting barley genes in wheat may be

acceptable to some, but putting animal genes in plants is a very different

thing.

“I am a vegetarian, so I think that if we do go down that path it should

only be with adequate labelling so that vegetarians/vegans and people not

wishing to use a GMO product can make an informed choice.

We have to thoroughly examine the possible benefits and risks to human

health and biodiversity.  We have to
have appropriate regulation and

environmental impact assessment procedures in place”, concluded Mr.

Churchill.

Darren Churchill

Australian Democrats candidate for Fraser

Darren.Churchill@act.democrats.org.au

0412 196 473